Judicial Watch Statement on Mueller Report – Judicial Watch – Tom Fitton

March 26, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

The long, national nightmare is over and President Trump has been vindicated. The corruptly-created and constitutionally abusive Mueller investigation failed to find any evidence to support the big lie that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government.

We’re pleased that AG Barr rejected Mueller’s attempt to smear President Trump with obstruction of justice innuendo by concluding that no such charges could be credibly sustained. Frankly, Mueller never had a valid basis upon which to investigate President Trump for obstruction of justice.

Let’s be clear, neither Mueller, the Obama FBI, DOJ, CIA, State Department, nor the Deep State ever had a good-faith basis to pursue President Trump on Russia collusion. Russia collusion wasn’t just a hoax, it is a criminal abuse, which is why Judicial Watch has fought and will continue to fight for Russiagate documents in federal court.

The targeting of President Trump served to protect Hillary Clinton and her enablers/co-conspirators in Obama administration from prosecution. Attorney General Barr can begin restoring the credibility of the Justice Department by finally initiating a thorough investigation of the Clinton emails and related pay-to-play scandals and the abuses behind the targeting of President Trump.

Source: Judicial Watch Statement on Mueller Report – Judicial Watch

Does Obama now have a date with the gallows? If the rule of law prevails, yes. | Non-Intervention2 – Michael Scheuer

March 25, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

During the years of the Muellar investigation the terms “treason” and “sedition” have been prominent in many discussions of the legal penalties appropriate for the government officials who set the witch hunt of President Trump underway and then prolonged it as far as possible. Now that the investigation is over and the President was not indicted, the full power of the law must be applied against those who deliberately robbed the republic of more than two years of its life solely because they lost an election and hate the man who beat them.

In other words, this episode is not finished, and it will not be complete until the Department of Justice cleanses itself and the FBI of those who began and abetted the witch hunt, and the President orders the directors of NSA, CIA, and any other participating federal agency to do the same. The number involved in this fraud probably will be in the hundreds. Ideally, all such disloyal people should be indicted and tried for their illegal behavior, but at a minimum they must be publicly named, fired, disenfranchised, and permanently banned from future employment with the national government.

For the high-ranking civil servants and politicians at all levels involved in the witch hunt, now is not a time for Americans to engage in the forgiveness and reconciliation they have shown themselves capable of in the past. In many ways, the past two-plus years posed more of a threat to the republic’s survival than the civil war. At worst, a Confederate victory would have would have created two North American republics with nearly identical Constitutions. A victory for the unconstitutional, Obama-led witch hunt against Trump, on the other hand, would have led to the removal of a legitimate president for no reason save his foes’ hatred and lust for power; the further accretion of power to the federal government; the federalization of elections, the simple description of which is tyranny; the end of, at least, the Electoral College and the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Amendments, and open borders and unlimited immigration. The legal retribution against those who have acted in a manner meant to destroy the republic must be precise, as fair as possible, and it must be conducted in public, go wherever the evidence leads, and led by prosecutors who proceed remorselessly.

Source: Does Obama now have a date with the gallows? If the rule of law prevails, yes. | Non-Intervention2

The Rutherford Institute :: Don’t Shoot the Dogs: The Growing Epidemic of Cops Shooting Family Dogs | By John W. Whitehead |

March 19, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

The absurd cruelties of the American police state keep reaching newer heights.

Consider that if you kill a police dog, you could face a longer prison sentence than if you’d murdered someone or abused a child.

If a cop kills your dog, however, there will be little to no consequences for that officer.

Not even a slap on the wrist.

In this, as in so many instances of official misconduct by government officials, the courts have ruled that the cops have qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that incentivizes government officials to engage in lawless behavior without fear of repercussions.

This is the heartless, heartbreaking, hypocritical injustice that passes for law and order in America today.

Source: The Rutherford Institute :: Don’t Shoot the Dogs: The Growing Epidemic of Cops Shooting Family Dogs | By John W. Whitehead |

Is AIPAC in Violation of Federal Election Law? – Centre for Research on Globalization – Renee Parsons

March 16, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

What newcomer to the US House of Representatives, Rep. Ilhan Omar(D-Mn) may not have fully realized  is that her critique of Israel influence on American politics would open a door that has previously been hermetically sealed as the third rail of American politics.  

With its influence carefully concealed behind decades of deceptions, lies and ruthless intimidation and representing a mere 2.1% of the population spread across nine states, AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and its supporters are like any school yard bully when confronted with a higher ethical authority.  They throw down the race card, an archaic accusation of anti-semitism intended to play on a misguided empathy that is no longer effective when confronted with words that speak truth to power.

Rep. Omar first came to our attention during a House Foreign Affairs Committee meeting with an elegant takedown of convicted felon and neo-con purveyor of brutal atrocities Elliot Abrams. Abrams is currently President Trump’s point man on plotting future military action in Venezuela.

Source: Is AIPAC in Violation of Federal Election Law? – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

The Rutherford Institute :: Forced Blood Draws & Implied Consent Laws Make a Mockery of the Fourth Amendment | By John W. Whitehead |

March 6, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

You think you’ve got rights? Think again.

All of those freedoms we cherish—the ones enshrined in the Constitution, the ones that affirm our right to free speech and assembly, due process, privacy, bodily integrity, the right to not have police seize our property without a warrant, or search and detain us without probable cause—amount to nothing when the government and its agents are allowed to disregard those prohibitions on government overreach at will.

This is the grim reality of life in the American police state.

Our so-called rights have been reduced to technicalities in the face of the government’s ongoing power grabs.

Source: The Rutherford Institute :: Forced Blood Draws & Implied Consent Laws Make a Mockery of the Fourth Amendment | By John W. Whitehead |

Is This Legal? Official Copies Of The Mueller Report Are Being Sold Online, And The Release Date Listed Is “March 26” – End Of The American Dream – Michael Snyder

March 5, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

Can this possibly be legal?  Somebody apparently thinks so, because copies of the Mueller report are being offered for sale online right now, and according to the pre-order announcement the release date is going to be “March 26”.  As a former attorney, I have no idea how anyone can legally do this.  As I have documented previously, when Mueller is done with his report he is supposed to submit it to Attorney General William Barr, and then it will be up to Barr to determine how much of the report, if any, will be made available to the public.  I suppose that it is possible that Barr has already agreed to release the full report to the public at the end of this month, but I find it difficult to believe that it would have been kept so quiet.  To me, something is not right about all of this.

Earlier today, I was shocked to hear that the Mueller Report was being offered for sale online, and so I decided to check it out for myself.

And sure enough, you can find it listed on Amazon.com for $9.37 right here.  “Robert S. Mueller III” is listed as an author, “Special Counsel’s Office U.S. Department of Justice” is listed as an author, and the listing tells us that the introduction will be written by attorney Alan Dershowitz.

Source: Is This Legal? Official Copies Of The Mueller Report Are Being Sold Online, And The Release Date Listed Is “March 26” – End Of The American Dream

Will Texas Heartbeat Bill Lead to Reversal of Roe v. Wade? – Steve Byas

March 5, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

A bill presently in both a House committee and in a Senate committee in the Texas Legislature — banning abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected — may be the vehicle that will give the Supreme Court the opportunity to reverse Roe v. WadeDoe v. Bolton, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, three decisions that have restrained states from passing laws outlawing abortion.

Roe v. Wade, a 7-2 ruling handed down in January 1973, held that a woman has a constitutionally protected right to an abortion, while the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision of 1992 declared that a state could not place an undue burden on a woman seeking an abortion.

This is why pro-abortion progressives fought so intently against the elevation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. He replaced Anthony Kennedy, who had generally favored abortion rights.

Source: Will Texas Heartbeat Bill Lead to Reversal of Roe v. Wade?

Idaho Proposal Answers New York, Virginia Infanticide Laws: “Abortion Is Murder!” – Richard Loudenback

February 20, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

Two pro-life constitutionalists in the Idaho state legislature are deadly serious about putting an end to the abortion slaughter in the Gem State. They have thrown down the gauntlet on the abortion issue. Boasting the best voting records in Idaho with the state Constitution are seasoned Representative Heather Scott and freshman Representative John Green, who are cosponsoring a bill to end the murdering of unborn human beings. Their bill, The Idaho Abortion Human Rights Act,would close loopholes that now exempt abortion from the state’s murder statute.

The Scott-Green bill is in marked contrast to the recently passed legislation in New York permitting pre-natal infanticide up until birth, and in Virginia, where even post-natal infanticide may now be permitted. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo sent a shock through the nation in January by signing into law a bill that allows pre-born babies to be killed up to the moment of birth.

Source: Idaho Proposal Answers New York, Virginia Infanticide Laws: “Abortion Is Murder!”

Eight Days in May – Editorial of The New York Sun

February 15, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

Maybe Hollywood will make a movie of the Trump administration called “Eight Days in May.” That’s the period in May 2017 between when President Trump fired the director of the FBI, James Comey, and Robert Mueller was named special prosecutor. Those days were, a new report says, when the Justice Department huddled on whether the new President could be removed under the 25th amendment.

The report is from the CBS’s interview with Andrew McCabe, the former acting director of the FBI who ended up getting fired for lying. “The most illuminating and surprising thing in the interview to me,” Scott Pelley of “60 Minutes” says, “were these eight days in May when all of these things were happening behind the scenes that the American people really didn’t know about.”

Like, say, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein offering to wear a wire in meetings with the newly elected President. “There were,” Mr. Pelley says, “meetings at the Justice Department at which it was discussed whether the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet could be brought together to remove the president of the United States under the 25th Amendment.”

Source: Eight Days in May

Time for Americans to observe a “Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day” | Non-Intervention2 – Michael Scheuer

February 11, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

I would propose, then, that the Congress officially designate January 22nd – the day Roe-v-Wade was decided by the Supreme Court — as America’s official “Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day”. It would be a day of reflection, solemnity, and deep shame for Americans, who have thus far failed to stop the unprecedented slaughter, and now see that the process of annihilation begun in 1973 is progressing to the murder of the just born and the dismembering of these dead Americans so that their well-developed body parts can be sold for profit. It also will be day of wonder, a wonder focused on why most of those Americans who mourn their own losses on their own “Holocaust Day” can, at the same time, be full-throated, whole-hearted, and rhetorically vicious defenders of laws that authorized the murder of 60 million fellow Americans, and made the republic’s Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day a necessity. One can only conclude that, for those phony mourners, the public use of the phrases “never again” and “never forget” are simply theatrical, and so amount to meaningless cant meant to keep cultivating guilt in Americans and to extort foreign aid for Israel from the Congress.

Source: Time for Americans to observe a “Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day” | Non-Intervention2

A Lawless Government – PaulCraigRoberts.org

January 30, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

I remember when a suspect was regarded as innocent until proven guilty in a fair trial. Today prosecutors convict their victims in the media in order to make an unbiased jury impossible and thereby coerce a plea bargain that saves the prosecutor from having to prove his case. In the United States law is no longer a shield of the people. Law is a weapon in the hands of prosecutors. (See Roberts & Stratton, The Tyranny of Good Intentions.)

Formerly, if a prosecutor staged an arrest for publicity purposes, as Mueller did by placing a CNN presstitute on the scene and sending a couple of dozen heavily armed men in a pre-dawn raid to arrest a well known political consultant for allegedly “lying to Congress” when the appropriate procedure is for Mueller to inform Stone’s lawyer to present his client for indictment, the judge would throw out the case on the grounds that the prosecutor’s unethical action had biased the juror pool and made a fair trial impossible. The judge might also have thrown out the case on the grounds of selective prosecution. James Clapper while serving as Director of National Intelligence lied to Congress under oath and suffered no consequences, and Hillary Clinton has clearly broken the law and lied about it.

Source: A Lawless Government – PaulCraigRoberts.org

CIS Sues SPLC, Alleges Wire Fraud, RICO Conspiracy l New American – R. Cort Kirkwood

January 17, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

The Center for Immigration Studies, a leading think tank focused on the costs and consequences of mass immigration, filed suit today against two top officials at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

SPLC President Richard Cohen and Intelligence Project Director Heidi Beirich, the lawsuit alleges, “have have been engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to harm CIS by falsely designating it a hate group.”

Source: CIS Sues SPLC, Alleges Wire Fraud, RICO Conspiracy

Feds Go After Bundys Again – American Free Press

January 15, 2019 by · Leave a Comment 

“My attorney [Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch] just wrote a letter to the Justice Department trying to get them to drop that appeal,” he told AFP. “They haven’t dropped it yet and they indicated they’re going forward with it. . . . You know, it’s Judge Navarro . . . I feel like she’s the one who needs to defend her decision there. But the attorneys don’t look at it that way, and they think they’ve got to get in there and have a big battle.”

Bundy agreed that this would violate double jeopardy, but the government doesn’t seem to care.

“They’re questioning [Judge Navarro’s] decision and sending her decision to the Ninth Circuit for appeal. I don’t see how they can do that, but the government just seems like they’re after me. They don’t care what they do. They’re going to get me one way or the other, I guess.”

Source: Feds Go After Bundys Again – American Free Press

Equal justice: ARREST Google CEO Sundar Pichai for lying to Congress – NaturalNews.com

December 12, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

 We’re constantly reminded by the left-wing media’s coverage of the Robert Mueller fiasco that “lying to the government is a crime.” In fact, Robert Mueller, utterly unable to find any real evidence linking Trump to Russia, has resorted to charging people with “lying to the government.”

The same government that constantly lies to us will prosecute you for lying to it. But you’re only prosecuted for lying if you’re a political target of the deep state regime in power. And that’s why Google CEO Sundar Pichai spent most of his day outright lying to the United States Congress today, with full knowledge that nothing will happen to him for the simple reason that Google censorship of conservatives is aligned with the ant-Trump agenda being played out by the deep state. (Read EvilGoogle.news to stay informed about the astonishing evil of the Google regime.)

Source: Equal justice: ARREST Google CEO Sundar Pichai for lying to Congress – NaturalNews.com

The Rutherford Institute :: A Crisis in the Making: Know Your Rights or You Will Lose Them |

December 12, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

We are approaching critical mass, the point at which all hell breaks loose.

The government is pushing us ever closer to a constitutional crisis.

What makes the outlook so much bleaker is the utter ignorance of the American people—and those who represent them—about their freedoms, history, and how the government is supposed to operate.

Source: The Rutherford Institute :: A Crisis in the Making: Know Your Rights or You Will Lose Them |

The Total Loss of the Rule of Law in the US, Will Lead to the Deadliest Purge In World History – Dave Hodges – The Common Sense Show

December 2, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

Restoring the aims of the globalists fell to the Deep State after Trump was elected and it is Mueller’s job to remove the speed bump of New World Order progress known as Donald Trump.

There has never been a more dastardly and deadly mafia organization that the Clinton Foundation. It steals from the endangered (eg Haitian relief funds). It murders whistleblowers (eg too many to list in this article) and it compromises politicians and law enforcement to do its bidding.

As whistle-blowers come forward to give testimony against this massive criminal enterprise, it is the job of people like ex-FBI director Robert Mueller to obstruct any incriminating information from coming forth.

Source: The Total Loss of the Rule of Law in the US, Will Lead to the Deadliest Purge In World History – Dave Hodges – The Common Sense Show

Prosecution of Julian Assange, America’s Betrayal of Its Own Ideals – Antiwar.com Original – Nozomi Hayase

November 26, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

As Trump’s administration now carries on Obama’s legacy, vowing to destroy WikiLeaks for engaging in publishing activities that are protected under the First Amendment, American people are slowly coming to see their own government’s dirty war that has been waged in their name.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange remains arbitrarily detained in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. As he is in a critical situation under a special protocol imposing prison-like surveillance, news emerged that shed light on the grave danger he has been facing. Last week, the Washington Post reported that the US Justice Department, in what appeared to be an error of cut and paste in their court filing, inadvertently disclosed criminal charges against Assange exist under seal.

Assange’s lawyer Jennifer Robinson responded to the revelation of a secret US government’s prosecution against the publisher, by noting that it confirms what Assange and his legal team have been suspecting. She pointed out how a criminal investigation into WikiLeaks started in 2010 in relation to disclosures made by WikiLeaks in partnership with other major newspapers revealing the evidence of US war crimes. She made it clear that this risk of his extradition to the US has been the reason why Assange sought and was granted asylum by Ecuador in 2012.

Source: Prosecution of Julian Assange, America’s Betrayal of Its Own Ideals – Antiwar.com Original

News With Views | Caravan Filled With Terrorists, MS 13, Drug Smugglers, And Welfare Seekers – Frosty Wooldridge

October 30, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union, a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot convene) against domestic violence.”

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he: assists an illegal alien, she/he should reasonably know is illegally within the Unite States or who lack employment authorization, by transporting, shelter, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or encourages that illegal alien to remain in the United States by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.” Federal Law—Section 8 USC 1324 (a) (1) (A) (iv) (b) (iii)

Source: News With Views | Caravan Filled With Terrorists, MS 13, Drug Smugglers, And Welfare Seekers

Supreme Court Takes Case That Could End Internet Censorship, Expand First Amendment | Zero Hedge

October 18, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to take a case that could change free speech on the Internet forever.

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, No. 17-702, the case that it has agreed to take, will decide if the private operator of a public access network is considered a state actor, CNBC reported.

The case could affect how companies like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google and YouTube are governed. If the Court were to issue a far-reaching ruling it could subject such companies to First Amendment lawsuits and force them to allow a much broader scope of free speech from its users.

Source: Supreme Court Takes Case That Could End Internet Censorship, Expand First Amendment | Zero Hedge

Michael Savage Calls on Trump to Order Arrest of Antifa Members

October 9, 2018 by · Leave a Comment 

Radio host Michael Savage has called on President Trump to direct Homeland Security to arrest prominent members of Antifa, labeling the organization a “domestic terrorist group”.

During an interview with the American Mirror, Savage said the group should be treated like the new Weather Underground.

“I think they have declared themselves to be a terrorist organization,” said Savage, pointing to a story from last month about how Antifa members strategized how they could carry out “ambushes and assassinations” to further their political agenda.

“They’re absolutely a domestic terrorist group, what else would anyone call them?” asked Savage.

Source: Michael Savage Calls on Trump to Order Arrest of Antifa Members

« Previous PageNext Page »


"Many seek to become a Syndicated Columnist,
while the few strive to be a Vindicated Publisher"

BREAKING ALL THE RULES


eXTReMe Tracker