I am now writing a piece for Truthout.org on the wider ramifications of the Bush Administration's lunatic dumping of a nuclear weapons "cookbook" on the Internet and leaving it posted up for months: a pearl beyond price for any government, militia, terrorist group, religious cult or criminal mafia hoping to wield some of the nuclear terror that has hitherto been the sole province of the world's "most developed" nations.
As we all know, the reason for this data-dump was purely and solely partisan politics: the Bush Faction wanted their little bootlickers in the rightwing blogosphere to cherry-pick the raw data from millions of Saddam-era documents in hopes of finding something that would goose a couple of news cycles here and there with stories of "revelations" that "justify" one or more of the Bush Regime's warmongering lies. They've been disappointed in this propaganda gambit, however – namely because there can be no data of WMD programs that didn't exist (or links to al Qaeda that never were). However, there was plenty of data on the almost-successful nuclear weapons program that Saddam had built before 1991 – with a mighty assist from a former U.S. president named George Bush. It was this data that the gormless son of Saddam's former accomplice and benefactor released for all the world to see.
It should surprise few readers that we think a vote that is seen—in America and the world at large—as a decisive “No” vote on the Bush presidency is the best outcome. We need not dwell on George W. Bush’s failed effort to jam a poorly disguised amnesty for illegal aliens through Congress or the assaults on the Constitution carried out under the pretext of fighting terrorism or his administration’s endorsement of torture. Faced on Sept. 11, 2001 with a great challenge, President Bush made little effort to understand who had attacked us and why—thus ignoring the prerequisite for crafting an effective response. He seemingly did not want to find out, and he had staffed his national-security team with people who either did not want to know or were committed to a prefabricated answer.
The meeting [sponsored by The Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, founded by the Jewish Agency] was attended by leaders of several major U.S. Jewish organizations, including David Harris of the American Jewish Committee, AIPAC's Howard Kohr, Malcolm Hoenlein of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League and Morley Levine from Hadassah. It was also attended Dennis Ross, the former Clinton administration special envoy to the Middle East; former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler; Brandeis University President Jehuda Reinharz; Israeli Cabinet Secretary Israel Maimon, representing the Israeli government; Yitzhak Molcho, who was formerly Benjamin Netanyahu's political advisor. The Jewish People Policy Planning Institute was represented by Dr. Yehezkel Dror, Institute Director General Avinoam Bar-Yosef and former Israeli Foreign Ministry director general Avi Gil.

50 YEARS SINCE THE SUEZ WAR
Today, 50 years will have passed since Anglo-French warships were moving on Suez to complete the last phase of a war intended to reshape the Arab world. The fiasco that the Suez War turned out to be was a political victory for Egypt and the Arab nation. Al-Ahram Weekly commemorates an event that was to shake the world and revolutionise the region
As an American and a Christian I am supposed to support and bow down to the authors of the crime that is pictured above.
CRIME! What sort of word is that to describe this act? What sort of word can properly describe the horrific injustice wrought against that innocent branch of God’s creation? Is this a display of the justice for which my country is supposed to be famous?
Cuban political prisoner beaten then placed in solitary confinement
By Cuban Democratic Directorate
His sister makes an urgent plea for his life
WASHINGTON - The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights said today that Cuba committed multiple violations when it imprisoned 75 dissidents and swiftly tried and executed three hijackers during a 2003 crackdown on dissent.
The decision by the commission, a branch of the Organization of American States, will likely have little immediate impact on the 61 dissidents still in jail or the relatives of the three hijackers because Cuba has not recognized previous commission decisions.
But human rights lawyers say it could lay the groundwork for reparations if there is a change in Cuba's government.
Video Webcast of Michel Chossudovsky's Lecture
McMaster University, September 2003

According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.
September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.
Chossudovsky peels back layers of rhetoric to reveal a complex web of deceit aimed at luring the American people and the rest of the world into accepting a military solution which threatens the future of humanity.
Controversial Film Lays Blame on Western Powers
Economic & Military Interference in the Middle East
How did Western Powers During WWI Ignite the Conflict we see Today?
"Powerful & Revealing Insight to the Power and Greed of the Times"
SNEAK PREVIEW OF INECOM
ENTERTAINMENT’S BLOOD AND
OIL – THE MIDDLE EAST IN WORLD WAR I
TO PREMIERE EXCLUSIVELY ON
MOVIELINK
Controversial Film about Consequences of Economic and Military Interference in the Middle East Available Exclusively on Movielink Before Worldwide Release on December 5.